-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 369
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement sending of allocated validator payments #11197
Implement sending of allocated validator payments #11197
Conversation
*/ | ||
function sendValidatorPayment(address validator) external { | ||
IAccounts accounts = IAccounts(getAccounts()); | ||
address signer = accounts.getValidatorSigner(validator); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I believe we didn't want to use signers @mcortesi @martinvol
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was basing this on how the current code works:
- the
elected
array in EpochManager gets set by callingElection.electNValidatorSigners
- That functions gets validator addresses via
Validators.getTopGroupValidators
- Which grabs the validator accounts and translates them to validator signer addresses, returning those
So in the current state, the correct way to index into elected
is via signer addresses.
If we want to change this logic, we should thoroughly double check everything is returning/using the correct type of validator address. As mentioned on Slack, a similar issue exists with the current use of Validators.computeEpochReward
, which expects a validator account, but gets a signer address (generated by the election). I would suggest this be done in a follow-up issue/PR that covers all instances of this.
In general I agree, we can probably just use account addresses everywhere. If I understand correctly, the only reason we used signer addresses in some places was because that's what celo-blockchain cared about in the PoS logic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
yes, we don't want signeers. EpochManager will have a list of elected account (not signers) and we should change elections to not give signers, i believe we even have a draft methos doing that...
the client didn't care about account, only about signers and so it sent signers everywhere, but that's unnecessary complexity now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Created an issue to track progress on this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
PR making the changes.
|
||
IStableToken stableToken = IStableToken(getStableToken()); | ||
|
||
require(stableToken.transfer(validator, validatorPayment), "mint failed to validator"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not mint but transfer. Can transfer fail?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
is validatorPayment always > 0?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can transfer fail?
If the contract doesn't have enough balance for example. Ideally that should never happen though, if our allocation and minting logic is correct. Auditors in the past have asked to always check return values of e.g. ERC-20 functions that return a success bool
, as good practice.
is validatorPayment always > 0?
I guess it could be 0, if delegation and/or commission take up the whole payment. I can add an if(non-zero)
around this as well. That said, transfers of 0 do not fail, as evidenced by the test_doesNothingIfNotAllocated
test not reverting.
require(stableToken.transfer(beneficiary, delegatedPayment), "mint failed to delegatee"); | ||
} | ||
|
||
emit ValidatorEpochPaymentDistributed(validator, validatorPayment, group, groupPayment); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this looks broken, even in Validators.sol. We record validator and group payments but not delegatee. Since this is a new event on a new contract, we should correct that
|
||
require(stableToken.transfer(validator, validatorPayment), "mint failed to validator"); | ||
if (groupPayment > 0) { | ||
require(stableToken.transfer(group, groupPayment), "mint failed to validator group"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not mint but transfer
require(stableToken.transfer(group, groupPayment), "mint failed to validator group"); | ||
} | ||
if (delegatedPayment > 0) { | ||
require(stableToken.transfer(beneficiary, delegatedPayment), "mint failed to delegatee"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
not mint but transfer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
FixidityLib.Fraction memory remainingPayment = FixidityLib.newFixed( | ||
totalPayment.fromFixed() - groupPayment | ||
); | ||
(address beneficiary, uint256 fraction) = getAccounts().getPaymentDelegation(validator); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
(address beneficiary, uint256 fraction) = getAccounts().getPaymentDelegation(validator); | |
(address beneficiary, uint256 delegationFraction) = getAccounts().getPaymentDelegation(validator); |
So it is more clear what does it stand for ?
* first compiling draft no working test. Co-authored-by: Martín Volpe <[email protected]> * Compiler fixes + finishNextEpochProcess * allocateValidatorsRewards compilable * First few tests * test fix * uisng registry instead * updated registry ID var names * typo * ++ mock contracts in 0.8 * ++ passing test using mock * Removal of using precompiles * ScoreManager refactor * Decouple epoch manager initializer from registry * isReadyToStartEpoch fix * startNextEpochProcess fixes * rename score manager to score reader * Rename transfer to release on CeloDistribution schedule * Celo distribution schedule renamed to CeloUnreleasedTreasure * conditions to getFirstBlockAtEpoch and getLastBlockAtEpoch * ScoreManager update * getFirstBlockOfEpoch in EpochManager initializer * extra checks * introduce new getValidatorsGroup * systemAlreadyInitialized update * Removal of IEpochManagerInterface * Made CI run on feature branch * merge fix * Added target for the CI * Fixed quote celo-monorepo.yml * Allow Validator registration in L2 without BLS key (#11181) * Allow validator registration in L2 without BLS key * Reallow ECDSA key change in L2 --------- Co-authored-by: Martín Volpe <[email protected]> * Fix CI * Fixed interfaces and imports * Build fix * lint * prettify * prettify 2 * Attempt to fix truffle build and migrations l2 epoch (#11190) * Added Blocking to LockedGold, Election (#11186) * add EpochManager to abis * force deploy abis * build fix * Move Validators.sol to 0.8 (#11192) * WIP * Validator test WIP, forge doesn't compile yet * buildable * most of the foundry tests working * Validator related tests fixed * truffle build working * cache bump * lint + prettify+ migrations * Enable optimization for Solidity 0.8 * prettify * Ci bump * CI bump 2 * Validators to 0.8 config * CI bump * foundry fix * Truffle migrations are partly fixed * Added import for ValidatorsMock08 in EpochManager.t.sol, I think it was removed by mistake * Added yarn.lock * Changes to mock with full implementation * Attempt to fix linking libraries not working with deployCodeTo foundry-rs/foundry#4049 * truffle migrations fixed * CI bump * lint * forge test fixes * artifacts test fix * lint * update of foundry version * add ProxyFactory import to tests * library linking fix * Foundry migrations fix * migration tests fix * CI bump * Little cleanup + retrigger CI * forgot to commit Validators.sol * Fixed the ABI encoded * lint * Fix contract versions * add Adapter to ignored contracts * revert of ReentrancyGuard change * lint fix * remove adapters from check * storage layout fix --------- Co-authored-by: pahor167 <[email protected]> * force release of canary abi * force new canary version * npm tag revert * Soloseng/update-l2-getepochnumber-logic (#11195) * disable getEpochSize on L2 * update registry * update relevant interfaces * update contracts with L2 `getEpochNumber()` logic * update tests with L2 `getEpochNumber()` logic * ++ TODO * moved constants to constants file * updated allocated supply function to handle L1 & L2 cases * made `epochManager.currenEpochNumber()` private, to avoid returning 0 when not initialized. * PR feedback * Passing validators test using mockEpochManager for L2 tests * clean up * fixed other failing tests * using mockEpochManager instead of interface. Fixed failing tests. * happy linter * revert npm tag ∆ * ++ TODO and comment * add score manager to abis * Split initEpochManager Function (#11199) * ++ contract function * ++ comment * startNextEpochProcess unit & integration test (#11191) * unit test with mocks * ++ integration tests * clean up * -- logging * removed duplicate interface * using `MockCeloToken` to get test to pass. Fails when it hits a precompile in `EpochRewards.sol` * removed endEpochTimestamp * moved IEpochManager to 0.5 folder * added L2 conditions for EpochRewards functions using precompiles Still missing tests * renamed EpochManagerInitializer due to name conflict * ++ more unit test * setup anvil migration fix name conflict * compiles * ++ require fund in unreleased treasury * Updated regex * ++ registry 0.8 for testing only * clean up * ++ unit test * initial integration test using L1 devchain * ++ comment * -- forge based integration test * ++ to const * happy linter * update contract name * ++ PR feedback * ++ checks * updated carbon address * proxy stableToken mint call via Validators contract * -- duplicate imports * removed registry08. replaced with vm call * PR feedback * -- coment * passing unit tests * clean up * ++ mintStable test * -- TODO; compiles test when filtering * PR feedback * updated migration script to add more validators * passing integration test * removed test for zero amount * yarn build fix * clean up comments && TODO * revert change as out of scope * E2E EpochManager test + Epoch truffle migrations & Anvil L2 migration build fix (#11198) * Soloseng/dynamically-fetch-epochmanagerenabler-address (#11207) * dynamically fetch epochManagerEnabler && carbonOffsettingPartner ++ to registry * PR feedback * removed onlyL1 modifier in setter functions * updated unit test to reflect changes * fixing tests * fix test * fixed migration data * fixed migration script error * removed unused modifier * removed duplicate or unused code * Implement sending of allocated validator payments (#11197) * EpochManager fixes (#11208) * truffle build fix * build fix * PR comments * prettify * rename of registerValidator overload * bug fix * extensing epochManager e2e test * yarn lint * Reset pending payment to 0 after sending (#11209) Reset pending payment to 0 when sending * Deleted duplicated import * Make captureEpochAndValidators work in constant time (#11210) * Use more general interface for token transfer (#11216) * Epoch manager enabler tests (#11213) * ++ basic test * -- celoToken balance check * cleanup comments * use celoToken instead of native token for `initializeSystem` balance check * ++ more test * removed additional epochs * Make sendValidatorPayment nonReentrant (#11217) * Martinvol/return account instead of signer (#11215) * EpochManager e2e tests add/remove validators between ecpochs (#11214) * Send validator payment on actions that would modify reward distribution (#11211) * Rename `CeloUnreleasedTreasure` to `CeloUnreleasedTreasury` (#11220) * updated `CeloUnrealeasedTreasure` to `CeloUnreleasedTreasury` * update `CeloUnreleasedTreasury` initial balance to use defined constant * renamed file * prevent CELO transfers to `CeloUnreleasedTreasury` * ++ comment * unused import * using internal accounting for released amount * updated integration test * PR feedback * PR feedback * reverted due to gas consideration * more revert --------- Co-authored-by: Martín Volpe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: pahor167 <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Martín Volpe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Martín Volpe <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Martin <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: pahor167 <[email protected]>
Description
Implements
sendValidatorPayment(address validator)
, which sends the cUSD validator payment allocated viaallocateValidatorRewards
to the validator, group, and delegation beneficiary.TODO:
distributeEpochPaymentsFromSigner
need to be carried overcomputeEpochReward
✅Questions:
Follow-ups:
Other changes
Changes to various mock contracts. In particular:
Tested
Forge unit tests.
Related issues
Documentation
Should add docs for validators on how to call this function to claim their payments.